Files
Portfolio/docs/reviews/audience-validation.md

46 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Evidence-first audience validation
Status: **PENDING — no independent reviewer session has been run.**
This is a release checkpoint, not an automated substitute for people. It must use at least three independent reviewers representing hiring-screening and technical-interview perspectives. Reviewers use Static or reduced motion first so the information hierarchy is judged without relying on the scene.
## Moderator script
1. Open a fresh portfolio session at the top. Do not introduce Luca or explain the page.
2. Set Static or use the reviewer's normal reduced-motion preference.
3. Start a 30-second timer. Ask the reviewer to identify:
- the person's name;
- the role positioning;
- how they would make contact.
4. Continue to 60 seconds. Ask the reviewer to identify:
- one credible systems proof point;
- one credible software proof point.
5. Ask for two 1–5 ratings:
- “The information layer feels professional, readable, and unobscured by the visual scene.”
- “The systems and software evidence feel balanced.”
6. Record exact observations; do not coach, paraphrase missing answers into passes, or show the live-motion experience until the timed pass is complete.
## Required threshold
- All three reviewers identify name, equal hybrid role, and contact path within 30 seconds.
- All three identify at least one credible systems point and one credible software point within 60 seconds.
- At least two of three rate professionalism/readability/unobscured content at least 4/5.
- At least two of three rate systems/software balance at least 4/5.
Any threshold failure requires content or hierarchy revision. It is not a reason to add visual effects.
## Evidence form
| Reviewer | Perspective | Mode/browser/viewport | 30 s identity/role/contact | 60 s systems proof | 60 s software proof | Professional/readable (1–5) | Balance (1–5) | Notes |
| --------- | ------------------- | --------------------- | -------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------- | --------------------------: | ------------: | ----- |
| Pending 1 | Hiring screening | | | | | | | |
| Pending 2 | Technical interview | | | | | | | |
| Pending 3 | Hiring or technical | | | | | | | |
## Sign-off
- Facilitator/date: pending
- Threshold result: pending
- Revisions required: pending
- Final reviewer confirmation after revisions, if any: pending